Can you be just a little bit interactive? Or is that just active?

Candide trailer

Watch the Candide promo video

I went to see the ENO’s stunning production of Candide the other night. Before the performance and during half-time the digital sign which displays the opera’s words above the stage, was flashing “write a review at eno interactive” and included a URL.

I was impressed; a brilliantly updated production with a modern way of allowing user-generated reviews. Resisting the urge to get on my phone there and then to submit something (friend would not have been impressed) I logged on the next day.

The “interactive hub”, which has some great resources like podcasts, video interviews and blog diaries, had a note from the ENO’s artistic director telling me the ways they give me an opportunity “to talk with us”.

Where was the reviews section? Where was a flashing sign saying “read reviews of Candide now”. Eventually under a drop down list called “Talk to ENO” I found the write a review section.

Here were the instructions:

Welcome to our reviews page. This is your opportunity to tell us what you thought of our productions, and to read other audience reactions. We love hearing what our audiences have to say about our shows and read each and every one of our reviews!

Send your review to insideout@eno.org

We promise to publish every review that we receive – provided it is not obscene or libellous.

Unsurprisingly there was not one single review submitted for Candide. Why not just allow people to automatically submit their reviews? If they’re that worried about the average ENO audience member being obscene or libellous (seriously?) they could run the community with a bit of pre-moderation.

These days, interactivity is not just the ability to hit play and watch a company produced video. It’s about enabling dialogue. This was the type of production where if you stood in the lobby at half-time people were shouting down their mobile phones “Tom! You’ve got to book tickets! It’s f*cking amazing!” (I’m serious, I’ve never seen anything like it).

This incredible conversation has not been harnessed and it’s a shame.

I’m not taking a pop at the ENO. They’ve got lots of modern, up to date, digital resource across their site. And it’s really good, but it still feels like broadcasting rather than dialogue.

As an organisation which fosters art & creativity they could be having fun getting a community involved. Look at the current trend for “sweding“. This is exactly the kind of thing they could be thinking of to encourage the next generation of audiences to the theatre.

What are your suggestions for how the ENO could be more interactive vs active?

About Darika

  • DarikaAhrens
    Hi Rachael!
    Sorry for the late reply - you got trapped in the spam queue.
    Thanks for coming here to chat and your "best of all possible methods" gag. V funny.
    I'm pleased the reviews are coming now. When I looked there was nothing yet or perhaps I couldn't find.
    Just to reiterate it was a *wonderful* production. One of the best I've ever seen. I don't expect ENO to be digital gurus when they're doing what they're meant to be doing so exceptionally well. Just wanted more people to be able to share what it was like to be at opening night.
    Best
    D
  • Hi there,
    Thanks for the feedback - I am conscious that our reviewing system isn't the most user-friendly and we're in the process of 'reviewing' it! Unfortunately, it's 'the best of all possible methods' at the moment, whilst we work on the bigger picture.
    Also, just wanted to highlight the Candide reviews which have been going up since opening night: http://www.enoinsideout.org.uk/eno/?page_id=97
    Best,
    Rachael Castell
    Interactive Producer, ENO
    www.eno.org/eno_interactive
    http://englishnationalopera.wordpress.com
    www.eno.org/candide
blog comments powered by Disqus