Why PR is losing the social media battle: Day One

Not a day goes by in my world without someone complaining about  rubbish use of social media in PR and how we’re just not “getting it”.

This frustrates me immensely as not only is it often true but I’ve always thought the PR industry has the most potential to rock social media strategy. PR is all about word-of-mouth right? [Reference great ad explaining the differences between PR, Advertising and co.]  So, why the bad rap?

I’m dedicating this week to a series of posts on where it went wrong and how to fix it. Starting with…

Campaign strategy vs. Brand strategy

Social media has tended to be funded on a campaign by campaign basis – short term activity.  Social media work by nature relies on building community and generating conversation – longer term commitment.

Traditional PRs cultivated their community, a.k.a. journalists, year round. A skilled PR could have a useful conversation any day of the week with a handful of key influencers they’d established a trusted relationship with.

Social media comes along and boom, the list of potential influencers suddenly grew by hundreds.  The tools needed to identify, sort, and categorise them are slow to appear

Slow and steady wins the race

On top of that,  categories fragmented further. Instead of being able to talk to people who broadly cover ‘Consumer Tech’, ‘B2B tech’, ‘Mobile tech’,  or ‘all of the above’, you need to be able to recall contacts with an interest in location-based service applications specifically for Symbian devices with a love of LOLCats and such like.  Sometimes there’s entire communities you’ve never heard of and it’s hard to define who, if anyone, would even be interested in a new Symbian LOLCat app.

It’s not possible to build trusted relations and have brand conversations in the short-term. Three months, the traditional quarterly budget or common campaign cycle, is not long enough.

If PR does succeed then what happens after the campaign has gone? Who looks after the abandoned profile or answers requests from a new blogger ‘friend’ who has suddenly moved down the list of importance?

The effort it takes to conceive and execute a social media campaign vs. investing in a longer-term brand strategy strikes me as a false economy.

I personally turn down a lot of short-term project work these days because I think it’s not possible to achieve much beyond securing a few blog posts. I also don’t like hearing from bloggers and community contacts that they weren’t looked after beyond the life-cycle of a specific campaign – I’m not in this industry for the short-term.

PR agencies with numerous mouths to feed don’t necessarily have that luxury but for their own sanity I hope they’re moving clients away from achieving short-term online objectives now. For in-house PR … what are you waiting for?!

Who could fix this?

  1. Clients: Stop giving piecemeal social media projects to agencies
  2. Agencies: Don’t let being competitive hold the industry back. Be brave and say ‘No’ sometimes

SOLUTION? Banish the term “can we get it out to some blogs?” from your vocabulary. Identify your most relevant communities [and not just blogs] from the start of your social media strategy and make that strategy brand-wide. Later you can build out to support campaign tactics.

Crib notes:

  • Develop ongoing and long-term brand relationships
  • Suspend traditional expectations like coverage
  • Add value: Ask not what can my community do for me but what can I do for my community?

If your business needs to change direction and target varying communities manically throughout the year then your problems are probably bigger than social media.

Image: Rennett Stowe

About Darika

  • http://twitter.com/Alfie Alfie Dennen

    Excellent summary of an endemic problem Darika. I think the irony is of course those professionals who actually care about 'social media', experts aside, absolutely see this, but in the current brand/agency relationship paradigm it's essentially impossible. There is no joined up thinking, especially with the further fragmentation of agencies employed to deliver on any one single campaign. The change in approach and thinking *has* to come from the brands, so perhaps a further strategy to make this change, agencies can act in concert to convince brands that they need to change how they work *fundamentally*, and they have to do it as soon as possible.

  • Kerrymg

    This is potentially the most useful set of blog posts I've ever read on the topic of Social Media and PR. I say potentially cos it's day 1 but if they're all up to this standard then wow.

    Enough fawning :)

    I have a question, who do you think we are losing the battle to, or are we just losing the battle against ourselves to make social media the natural remit of PR and/or to get the most out of it?

  • DarikaAhrens

    The multi-agency relationship is well observed Alfie. The chances of them all playing nice together are slim until they align in approach. I'm not sure how to do that!

  • DarikaAhrens

    Oh god Kerry – the pressure is too much for me!

    I'm very agency in my thinking. Yes, we're losing to ourselves but also I see PR losing social media budget and opportunity to sexy digital, advertising and creative agencies every day.

    I'm not saying those disciplines don't understand social media and don't do great campaigns but PR could be driving this bus so that it's strategically relevant not a quick marketing tactic.

  • http://thecommscorner.blogspot.com/ Adam Vincenzini

    Darika – great idea and great first post, looking forward to the rest of the week – I think the point about agencies not being greedy is an important one.
    But I think the client point is even more important – and I often think it's not the client's fault.
    I'm currently working on a social media campaign for a client who, because it is such unchartered territory for them has no choice but to 'suck it and see.'
    I think both sides have to be equally fair to each other – I'd love to have a bunch of retained agreements in place but PR moved away from that world a long time ago and it only seems natural for this to follow suit.
    Adam

  • http://tribalboogie.blogspot.com/ Paul Sutton

    Hi Darika
    Great idea for a series of posts, and really looking forward to reading the rest of the week. Your first point about brand strategy really is spot on – it's frustrating to be asked repeatedly “can we add some social media into this campaign” when the campaign turns out to be a short-term 2 month blitz. I personally believe its down to PRs themselves to educate their clients to the fact that social media is an ongoing strategy, not a short-term fix. But therein lies the problem with PR agencies at present as, in my experience at least, PRs aren't investing the time to actually learn about and understand social media themselves. I wrote a blog post on this very issue only last week that is attracting some very interesting viewpoints – http://bit.ly/9WUNws. The longer this perpetuates, the further behind PR is likely to fall.
    Paul

  • DarikaAhrens

    I think we're pretty much in agreement Adam. I like to highlight the fact that PR is a service delivery business and as such has to do what the client requests. Many PRs desperate for a new fee income will have to take on a project that goes against their consultancy (my point “just say no”).

    Further to that, yeah we have moved from retainers but that's only because a highly competitive market + the recession has increased pressure to accept more projects – usually on the promise of further work. I don't think we should follow suit as generally it leads to the kinds of quick and dirty campaigns I'm railing against.

    I'd advise to clients that if they can't commit to a mid-to-long term strategy with a service provider then shop around until they can. (Start-ups aside)

  • http://thecommscorner.blogspot.com/ Adam Vincenzini

    It's definitely a balancing act, no doubt about that.
    I am still conflicted about whether we need posts like yours (and Paul's) to move things along – on one hand I think highlighting what we need to do is great, on the other, it also makes the industry look a little insecure – should we focus more on proactively creating solutions / ideas that work?
    Only time will tell, and only after some successful long-term campaigns have been activated will we be able to promote our case with more confidence.
    I don't know about you, but I think the right chances given to the right people / agencies will deliver that result.

  • DarikaAhrens

    1. The industry already looks insecure, check out my intro, every day our reputation as PR professionals is taking a beating
    2. Each of my posts is topped and tailed with a “Problem” and “Solution” box. I've also invited people to contribute to a week of best practice posts with with #fixPR
    3. Many long-term campaigns have been activated and are currently held-up as best practice. Agencies have had enough time to get their ducks in a row, enough waiting already ;-)

  • http://thecommscorner.blogspot.com/ Adam Vincenzini

    Gimme a couple seconds while I hop back in my box ;)
    Don't get me wrong, I think this series of posts has a great upside and collaboratively developing solutions is a great way to improve / enhance our reputation…but I'm like you, I just want to get on with it!!

  • http://rock-star-pr.com/blogger-outreach-why-you-should-do-it/ Blogger outreach: why you should do it | Jed Hallam

    [...] Gaffney and Darika Aherns, I bloody love them both. They both spit truth and fire and always manage to post my brain thoughts [...]

  • http://pniq.co.uk/2010/02/09/the-digital-week-12/ The Digital Week «

    [...] to keep a beady eye: Darika Ahrens is in the midst of a cracking series covering how PR should strengthen its lot online, and our very own Kerry Gaffney and northern-type Jed Hallam have both formulated [...]

  • jasmineguevara

    I couldn't agree more! The most relevant communities are not confined to just blogs! It's very important to identify the communities that the organization plans to serve and by doing that, the organization can better learn more about them and what they can do to serve them…vs. looking at it as a short-term gig with a whats-in-it-for-me attitude. Relationships = long term. And, social media is all about relationships. So you're right – definitely suspend “traditional expectations” like coverage! It's challenging when a client hires a consultant with tactics already set in their mind and then they expect the consultant to create a strategy based on the tactics that they had already envisioned. The consultant must be brave enough to take a step back to assess the situation and at times, provide change management consultation before recommending a social media strategy. Otherwise, social media efforts are bound to yield less-than-optimal results.

  • http://www.garyandrews.net/2010/02/17/fix-pr-why-pr-is-losing-the-social-media-battle/ Fix PR: Why PR is losing the social media battle » Gary Andrews

    [...] nothing that can’t be fixed but, as Darika says, we have a long way to [...]

  • Jon Barron

    Whatever happened to Day 2?

  • Anonymous